Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528272›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Multi-omics surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in the pig gut microbiome.

Judith Guitart-Matas, Arturo Vera-Ponce de León, Phillip B Pope, Torgeir R Hvidsten, Lorenzo Fraile, Maria Ballester, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas, Lourdes Migura-Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Judith Guitart-MatasJoint Research Unit IRTA-UAB in Animal Health, Animal Health Research Centre (CReSA), Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Arturo Vera-Ponce de LeónFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Phillip B PopeFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Torgeir R HvidstenFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Lorenzo FraileDepartment of Animal Production, School of Agrifood and Forestry Science and Engineering (ETSEA), University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Maria BallesterAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, Catalonia, Spain.
Yuliaxis Ramayo-CaldasAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, Catalonia, Spain. yuliaxis.ramayo@irta.cat.
Lourdes Migura-GarciaJoint Research Unit IRTA-UAB in Animal Health, Animal Health Research Centre (CReSA), Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain. lourdes.migura@irta.cat.

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization 10385Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC2019-027244-IMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad RTI2018-095586-B-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput sequencing technologies play an increasingly active role in the surveillance of major global health challenges, such as the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The post-weaning period is of critical importance for the swine industry and antimicrobials are still required when infection occurs during this period. Here, two sequencing approaches, shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, have been applied to decipher the effect of different treatments used in post-weaning diarrhea on the transcriptome and resistome of pig gut microbiome. With this objective, a metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) catalogue was generated to use as a reference database for transcript mapping obtained from a total of 140 pig fecal samples in a cross-sectional and longitudinal design to study differential gene expression. The different treatments included antimicrobials trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, colistin, gentamicin, and amoxicillin, and an oral commercial vaccine, a control with water acidification, and an untreated control. For metatranscriptomics, fecal samples from pigs were selected before weaning, three days and four weeks post-treatment.

resultsThe final non-redundant MAGs collection comprised a total of 1396 genomes obtained from single assemblies and co-assemblies per treatment group and sampling time from the metagenomics data. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) at this assembly level considerably reduced the total number of ARGs identified in comparison to those found at the reads level. Besides, from the metatranscriptomics data, half of those ARGs were detected transcriptionally active in all treatment groups. Differential gene expression between sampling times after treatment found major number of differential expressed genes (DEGs) against the group treated continuously with amoxicillin, with DEGs being correlated with antimicrobial resistance. Moreover, at three days post-treatment, a high number of significantly downregulated genes was detected in the group treated with gentamicin. At this sampling time, this group showed an altered expression of ribosomal-related genes, demonstrating the rapid effect of gentamicin to inhibit bacterial protein synthesis.

conclusionsDifferent antimicrobial treatments can impact differently the transcriptome and resistome of microbial communities, highlighting the relevance of novel sequencing approaches to monitor the resistome and contribute to a more efficient antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceMetagenome-assembled genomesMetatranscriptomicsPost-weaningSwine

Identifiers

PMID40528272
PMCPMC12172226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.