ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Podcasts as a platform for sharing and disseminating experiences and expertise between young adults with cancer and radiotherapy researchers.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Involvement of underserved 18-40 year olds living with early-onset type 2 diabetes in the M3 NIHR programme grant.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Podcasting and Blogging as Tools to Engage with the Public on the Topic of Cancer: Experience and Perspectives of the Public Interest Group on Cancer Research.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We set out to co-create a collaborative project that would raise awareness of radiotherapy, explore young adults' experiences of cancer treatment, and share radiotherapy research with audiences beyond academia. To do this, we partnered radiotherapy researchers with young adults who had undergone radiotherapy, co-creating a series of episodes for an established oncology podcast. These conversations offered space for participants to share their stories and personal insights, both as patients and as researchers. Six young adults and six researchers took part, supported by preparatory discussions to help shape meaningful conversations. Each podcast episode featured unique patient experiences alongside different areas of radiotherapy research. An independent evaluation, based on semi-structured interviews with participants and hosts, highlighted the importance of relational connection, mutual respect, and the value of having a dedicated project coordinator. The episodes were downloaded over 3000 times in 120 countries. Participants described feeling heard and appreciated, and several researchers reflected on the renewed motivation and perspective gained through the project. This collaboration suggests how podcasting has the potential to serve as an accessible and emotionally resonant tool for engagement, enabling researchers and patients to connect in new ways and share knowledge with a broader public. Future projects of this kind may benefit from a similar co-creative and well-supported approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.