Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528257›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Evaluation of the effectiveness of Aquatain, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis, and Temephos on Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles stephensi larvae in the laboratory and field settings.

Sisay Dugassa, Tilahun Kebede, Bedri Abdulatif, Gudissa Assefa, Hiwot Solomon, Dejene Getachew, Kidane Lelisa, Araya Gebresilassie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NativeJournal of tropical medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Susceptibility ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sisay DugassaAklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. sisaydlw2@gmail.com.
Tilahun KebedeFederal Ministry of Health, Malaria and Other Vector-Borne Diseases Prevention and Control Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bedri AbdulatifFederal Ministry of Health, Malaria and Other Vector-Borne Diseases Prevention and Control Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gudissa AssefaFederal Ministry of Health, Malaria and Other Vector-Borne Diseases Prevention and Control Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hiwot SolomonFederal Ministry of Health, Malaria and Other Vector-Borne Diseases Prevention and Control Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dejene GetachewDepartment of Applied Biology, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia.
Kidane LelisaAklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Araya GebresilassieDepartment of Zoological Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. arayagh2006@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main tools to control malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa are long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying. However, their sustainability is threatened by the emergence of insecticide resistances, behavioral avoidance and presence of outdoor biting mosquito populations. Thus, complementary interventions such as larval source management, which includes larviciding, are required to achieve better results in malaria vector control. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of three larvicides (Aquatain AMF

methodsThe tests on insectary colony and field-collected immature stages of the mosquitoes were conducted in the laboratory. For this, the third and fourth larval instars of An. arabiensis and An. stephensi were placed in trays measuring 50 cm × 40 cm, and larvicides were applied to the treatments while the control trays were left untreated. In addition, the larvicides were applied to selected natural habitats, and their effects on the reduction of the immature stages' density were estimated.

resultsIn the laboratory, susceptible An. arabiensis showed mortality rates of 95% with Aquatain, 100% with Bti and 100% with Temephos, while An. stephensi showed 60% with Aquatain, 84% with Bti and 100% with Temephos. The percentage of larval mortalities among wild An. arabiensis collected from the field and exposed to Aquatain, Bti and Temephos were 97%, 100% and 100%, respectively, whereas those of An. stephensi were 74%, 99% and 100%, respectively. During the natural field study, the reductions in immature stages were as follows: 77%, 96% and 95% in Adama; 89%, 95% and 94% in Metahara; and 92%, 84% and 96% in Awash for Aquatain, Bti and Temephos, respectively.

conclusionsThe three larvicides, Aquatain, Temephos and Bti, provided high levels of larviciding efficacies in both laboratory and field evaluations. Despite its effectiveness, Temephos caused the water to turn whitish and emitted a strong odor that made the community wary regarding the treated habitats. Therefore, we recommend using Aquatain in mosquito control programs as a complementary malaria vector control tool.

Indexed as

AnophelesBacillus thuringiensisInsecticidesMosquito ControlTemefosAnimalsLarvaMalariaMosquito VectorsPest Control, BiologicalInsecticidesTemefosAnopheles arabiensisAnopheles stephensiAquatainBtiLarvicidesTemephos

Identifiers

PMID40528257
PMCPMC12172309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.