Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528199›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

New technologies and related changes at work as triggers for professional development in the nursing domain: an exploratory interview study.

L Romina Bornhaupt, Regina H Mulder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Romina BornhauptFaculty of Human Sciences, UR - University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. romina.bornhaupt@ur.de.
Regina H MulderFaculty of Human Sciences, UR - University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological developments are changing work in healthcare. To keep up with these changes, nurses need to continuously adapt which requires three components of professional development: Elaboration, expansion, and externalization. Few studies, with partly inconsistent results, address technology-driven changes at work in the nursing sector. However, the implications of these changes for nurses' professional development remain unclear. The aim of the present study was therefore to explore the changes at work resulting from the implementation of technology, which learning activities emanate from these changes, and what the triggers are for professional development.

methodAn exploratory, qualitative research design was applied. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews using the Critical Incidents Technique. Ten nurses with state-approved professional qualification in nursing, geriatric care, or equivalent nursing training took part in the study. Data analysis was conducted in a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis using a concept-driven coding frame.

resultsChanges in work characteristics were reported for each category of technology. Regarding the individual categories of work characteristics (task, social, contextual), however, partly different changes were mentioned in relation to the technology categories. Learning activities from all three categories were identified. There are indications that both the usage of technology itself as well as the consequential changes at work can trigger professional development. However, differences were reported in terms of the components of professional development: Mentioned was that elaboration was triggered by the usage of technology and changes at work, and that expansion was related to problems and knowledge gaps associated with the technology and related changes. Externalization, in turn, was linked to social aspects and staff responsibility.

conclusionsThe results show how nurses can learn due to technology-driven changes at work. Furthermore, initial insights were gained on how work characteristics, learning activities and triggers are related. These findings can help to consider the specifics of the situation when planning the implementation of technologies, processes that results from that, and how professional development can be fostered.

Indexed as

Change at workCritical incident techniqueHealthcareInterview studyLearningNursingProfessional developmentTechnologyWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID40528199
PMCPMC12172304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.