ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2025
Evaluation of semen parameters and histopathological comparison of inguinal and abdominal orchiectomy specimens in late post pubertal men with unilateral undescended testis.
Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe embryological development of the testicles and their descent to the scrotum is multifactorial process, and the role of the internal inguinal ring has not yet been clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of the internal inguinal ring in this process by comparing the inguinal and abdominal orchiectomy specimens histopathologically. The patients were classified according to localization of the undescended testicle as group 1 (n = 11), consisting of abdominal-localized individuals, and group 2 (n = 40), composed of inguinal-localized individuals. Data regarding age, side of the undescended testicle, testicular volume, spermatic cord length, testosterone level, semen analysis, and histopathological reports of undescended testicles in both groups were analyzed and compared.
resultsThe median age of groups 1 and 2 was twenty-one. The median testicular volume was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.002). In addition, progressive motility and normal sperm morphology rates were substantially higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.019 vs p = 0.029). There was no difference between the groups in terms of analyses of histopathological parameters performed in testis tissue. (p > 0.05).
conclusionsAlthough testicular volume, sperm motility, and normal morphology rates were lower in abdominal testes, no significant differences were found in histopathological parameters between the groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.