Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528162›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Adherence to Repeat Screening Completion for Colorectal Cancer Using the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test: Real-World Analysis of Patients from Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Mallik Greene, Timo Pew, Jorge Zapatier, Juliana Vanessa Rincón López, Paul Limburg, Martha Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mallik GreeneExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-5483
Timo PewExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Jorge ZapatierDigestive Diseases Consultants, Altamonte Springs, FL, USA.
Juliana Vanessa Rincón LópezUnisanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Paul LimburgExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Martha DuarteKeralty Hospital Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

objectivesThis real-world study examined adherence to repeat mt-sDNA among patients from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) across the US and among different payer types.

methodsData from Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC were used for the period between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, for those who had previously completed a mt-sDNA test. Study outcomes included adherence rate to mt-sDNA repeat screening and time to test return.

resultsThe study sample consisted of 19 536 eligible patients. The mt-sDNA repeat screening adherence rate was 79.7%, and the mean time to return the kit was 21.1 ± 20.8 days. Repeat screening adherence for patients with Medicare was 84.7%, Medicare Advantage was 80%, commercial insurance was 78.2%, managed care organization was 74.6%, and Medicaid was 65.9% (

conclusionsWhile repeat screening adherence was generally high across patient demographic categories, there were significant differences by type of insurance coverage and number of prior successful mt-sDNA screenings.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDNAEarly Detection of CancerFecesPatient ComplianceAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedUnited StatesDNAadherencecolon cancermt-sDNArepeat screeningstool-based tests

Identifiers

PMID40528162
PMCPMC12174683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.