Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528148›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

A behavioural and neurobiological assessment of effort-based decision-making in cannabis use disorder: An initial/preliminary investigation.

Sarah L Brassard, Jadyn Dosanjh, Jessica Cooper, Jochen Weber, David Zald, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L BrassardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Jadyn DosanjhPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5 th Street, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jessica CooperTranslational Research in Affective Disorders Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jochen WeberDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
David ZaldBrain Health Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
James MacKillopDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Iris M BalodisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. balodisi@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low motivation for noncannabis rewards is a common clinical feature of cannabis use disorder (CUD), yet its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. This study applied a sequential effort-based decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify motivation and test for potential neurofunctional differences during prospective effort/reward encoding (Cue1), integration of effort and reward cues (Cue2), and choice behaviour in individuals with CUD (n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 20). Behavioural in-scanner results demonstrated that participants in both groups made significantly fewer high-effort choices as effort levels increased on the task, yet they selected significantly more high-reward choices as reward magnitude increased. At the neural level, the CUD group showed decreased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity, as well as reduced activity in the culmen, posterior cingulate, and superior temporal gyrus during the encoding of prospective effort and reward cues (Cue1) respectively, compared with controls. Conversely, the CUD group showed increased parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and claustrum activity during the integration phase of the task (Cue2) relative to controls. Exploratory correlations revealed that bilateral ventral striatum activity during prospective effort cues was associated with the proportion of accepted high-effort and high-reward trials, predominantly driven by the CUD group. Altogether, these findings indicate fronto-striatal but also posterior cortical processing alterations during prospective signaling and during effort-reward information integration. By temporally disconnecting effort expenditure from reward magnitude, the current findings shed light on how these constructs independently and simultaneously influence dysregulated effortful goal-directed choice behaviour in CUD.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingMarijuana AbuseMotivationRewardAdultBrain MappingChoice BehaviorCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultCannabis use disorderChoice behaviourEffort-based decision-makingEffort expenditureImagingNeural correlatesReward sensitivityValuation

Identifiers

PMID40528148
PMCPMC13227493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.