Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528146›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2026

Empathy in Adults with Acquired Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Emily Clements, Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Michael Weinborn, Carmela Pestell, Dawn Neumann, David Preece, Rodrigo Becerra

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily ClementsSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. emily.clements@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-8808
Kristin Naragon-GaineySchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-6880
Michael WeinbornSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-9930
Carmela PestellSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1737-7774
Dawn NeumannMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-8761
David PreeceSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-2024
Rodrigo BecerraSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-7254

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathy is the ability to recognise, share and understand others' emotional states. Increasing evidence suggests that empathy may be impacted by acquired brain injury (ABI), with consequences for social and emotional functioning. However, the literature has been characterised by inconsistent findings and small sample sizes. To address these limitations, we provide the first meta-analytic review of empathy in adults with ABI. Specifically, the review aimed to quantify the degree of impairment in adults with ABI across four empathy-related domains: cognitive, affective, empathic concern (e.g. sympathy) and personal distress. We also sought to estimate the prevalence of deficits in each area and explore whether demographic and injury factors moderate impairment. A systematic search yielded 29 studies measuring self-reported empathy in adults with ABI versus healthy, matched peers. A series of random-effects meta-analyses revealed moderate deficits in cognitive empathy (Hedges' g =  - 0.68, 95% CI [- 0.87, - 0.50]) and affective empathy (Hedges' g =  - 0.43, 95% CI [- 0.65, - 0.21]), as well as small-to-moderate deficits in empathic concern (Hedges' g =  - 0.38, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.13]). No significant difference was found for personal distress. We estimated the proportion of ABI participants scoring equal to or more than 1 SD below the normative mean to be 15.3-35.0%, depending on the empathy subcomponent. Our results highlight that empathy deficits may play an important role in functional or emotional difficulties post-brain injury. This demonstrates the need for routine clinical assessment of empathy in survivors of brain injury and the need to develop interventions which target both cognitive and affective components.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesEmpathyAdultHumansAcquired brain injuryAffectiveCognitiveEmpathySocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID40528146
PMCPMC13388439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.