Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528085›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Trends in adverse drug reaction reporting in eight selected countries after the implementation of new pharmacovigilance regulation in 2012: a joinpoint regression analysis.

Greta Masiliūnienė, Edgaras Stankevičius, Edmundas Kaduševičius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Greta MasiliūnienėInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania. greta.masiliuniene@lsmu.lt.
Edgaras StankevičiusInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Edmundas KaduševičiusInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUnderreporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remains to be a challenge in modern health care. Major reforms in the EU pharmacovigilance system in 2012 introduced the legal basis for consumers to report suspected ADRs. This study was designed to determine trends in overall ADR reporting, the ratio of health care professional (HCP)-to-consumer ADR reporting, and the ratio of serious-to-nonserious ADR reporting for an 11-year period in the selected non-EU and EU countries that had implemented systems for consumers' reporting before the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation and those that did not have. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe national competent authorities of 15 countries (11 EU countries, former EU member the UK, Australia, Canada, and the USA) were contacted via e-mail and asked to provide the total number of ADR reports, numbers of ADRs reported by consumers and HCPs, numbers of serious and nonserious ADRs, and top 5 medication groups causing ADRs by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system during the period of 2012-2022. Eight countries, namely Belgium, Canada, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and the UK, responded and provided the data. The trends of ADR reporting were evaluated with the joinpoint regression analysis method. The annual percent change (APC) and the average annual percent change (AAPC) were estimated.

resultsOver the study period, the overall rates of ADR reporting increased significantly in all the countries except for Belgium, with the greatest AAPC being in Lithuania (AAPC of 32.34) and the lowest, in Canada (AAPC of 10.3). The ratios of HCP-to-consumer ADR reporting were significantly decreasing in all the countries (AAPC range, -43.7 to -24.9) except for Canada where an opposite significant trend toward an increasing HCP reporting rate (AAPC of 3.9) for 2012-2020 was observed. The ratios of serious-to-nonserious ADR reporting were significantly decreasing in more than half of the countries, namely Canada, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Portugal, with the greatest negative AAPC being in Lithuania (AAPC of -32.9) and the smallest, in Canada (AAPC of -6.8). Vaccines (J07), immunosuppressants (L04), antineoplastic agents (L01), antibacterials for systemic use (J01), and antithrombotic agents (B01) were found to be the top 5 most frequently reported medications.

conclusionsThis study shows the significant upward trends in overall ADR reporting not only in the countries that implemented consumer ADR reporting systems after the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation but also in countries that had consumer reporting systems before 2012. Moreover, significant downward trends in the ratios of HCP-to-consumer ADR reporting were documented for all EU countries, confirming increasing consumers' involvement in ADR reporting. Further, larger scale studies with the involvement of more countries are needed to better understand the trends in ADR reporting, and multifaceted interventions are warranted to be installed to enhance ADR reporting.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceEuropeEuropean UnionHumansRegression AnalysisAdverse drug reactionsAnatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification systemConsumersHealth care professionalsJoinpoint regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID40528085
PMCPMC12398448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.