Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528056›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Evaluation of primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases.

Katie Rogers, Emily Highsmith, Zhongya Wang, Katy M Toale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie RogersDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 90, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. kroger42@jh.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0554-7588
Emily HighsmithDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 90, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0617-3941
Zhongya WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1411, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3866-8052
Katy M ToaleDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 90, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-7309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHospitalized patients with cancer have high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and often receive prophylactic anticoagulation. However, in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases, the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage must be carefully considered. The purpose of this study is to describe the rates of VTE and bleeding in hospitalized patients with primary brain tumors and metastases with and without prophylactic anticoagulation.

methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, adult patients with primary or secondary brain tumors, admitted to the hospital and without a contraindication to prophylactic anticoagulation, were identified. Patients were stratified via adequate prophylaxis, defined as an administration of a prophylaxic dose of anticoagulation for ≥80% of days admitted to the hospital versus inadequate VTE prophylaxis, defined as an administration of a prophylactic dose of anticoagulation for <80% of days admitted to the hospital.

resultsOf the 2908 admissions meeting inclusion criteria, 492 (17%) received adequate VTE prophylaxis and 2416 (83%) received inadequate VTE prophylaxis. Of the 538 patients with high bleed risk cancers, defined as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, thyroid cancer, choriocarcinoma, and hepatocellular cancer, 493 (92%) of patients received inadequate VTE prophylaxis, and only 45 (8%) received adequate VTE prophylaxis. In the entire cohort, the rate of VTE events during hospitalization was 2% in the adequate VTE prophylaxis group versus 9% in the inadequate VTE prophylaxis group (p < 0.001). Major bleeding events also occurred less frequently in the cohort receiving adequate VTE prophylaxis (1%) compared to inadequate VTE prophylaxis (8%) (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was similar between both groups, with a rate of 4% in patients receiving adequate VTE prophylaxis and 7% in patients receiving inadequate VTE prophylaxis (p = 0.051). Of patients who died in the hospital, 9% had a cause of death related to bleeding or thrombosis, all in the cohort receiving inadequate VTE prophylaxis compared to 0% in the adequate group.

conclusionPatients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases receiving adequate VTE prophylaxis had a numerically lower rate of VTE events and major bleeding events overall during hospitalization compared to patients receiving inadequate VTE prophylaxis. VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with low bleeding risk metastases and primary brain tumors appears to be safe and effective; however, more data is needed in patients with high bleeding risk metastases due to the low numbers of patients with adequate VTE prophylaxis in this cohort.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBrain NeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemorrhageHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationBrain metastasisPrimary brain tumorVenous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.