ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
A cross-sectional association study of paravertebral muscle quality and modic changes in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioengineering Innovations for Personalized Care in Low Back Pain: From Sensors to Smart Therapeutics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the association between paravertebral muscle quality and Modic changes (MCs) in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP).
methodsThe cases and imaging data of patients with CLBP who were treated in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized into MCs group and non-MCs group according to the presence or absence of Modic changes in lumbar spine MRI. Based on lumbar MRI, the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of bilateral multifidus, erector spinae and psoas major muscles, fat infiltration rate (FIR) and lumbar indentation value (LIV) were measured in the L2-S1 segments of both groups of patients, respectively.
resultsThe VAS score of patients in the MCs group was significantly higher than that of patients in non-MCs group, and the degree of intervertebral disc degeneration was more severe than that of patients in non-MCs group (P < 0.05). At the L2-L3 and L3-L4 segments, the CSA of the bilateral erector spinae muscles in the MCs group was significantly smaller than that of patients in non-MCs group (P < 0.05). On the contrary, the FIR of paravertebral muscle was higher than that of patients in non-MCs group (P < 0.05). At the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments, the CSA of bilateral erector spinae and multifus muscles in the MCs group were smaller than those in the non-MCs group, and the FIR was higher than that in the non-MCs group (P < 0.05). The LIV of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments in the MCs group were significantly lower than those in the non-MCs group (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that there might be a association between low bilateral multifidus, erector spinae CSA and LIV, and high multifidus, erector spinae FIR and Modic changes.
conclusionOur research results indicate that there is a association between paravertebral muscle quality and Modic changes in patients with CNLBP. There may be an interaction between low bilateral multifidus, erector spinae CSA and LIV, high bilateral multifidus, erector spinae FIR and lumbar Modic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40528021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.