ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Disc bulging predicts poor outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a prevalent degenerative musculoskeletal disorder in aging populations. While decompression surgery is a standard treatment, some patients require revision surgery. Disc bulging, a distinct component of the degenerative process separate from disc herniation, contributes to spinal stenosis. However, its impact on surgical outcomes for LSCS has never been examined. This study aimed to elucidate the influence of disc bulging on outcomes of decompressive surgery for LSCS, addressing a critical knowledge gap.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 517 consecutive patients involving 912 intervertebral levels who underwent decompression surgery for LSCS. We statistically evaluated the association between disc bulging and revision surgery. Two measures were utilized to assess disc bulging: the extended area of the disc (EAD), referring to the horizontal expansion of the disc, and the disc bulging length (DBL), which indicated the degree of disc intrusion into the spinal canal. Other conventional radiographical assessments and patient background characteristics were also evaluated.
resultsRevision surgery was required in 28 patients (5.4%) involving 31 intervertebral levels (3.4%). Patients requiring revision surgery were significantly younger and more likely to smoke. Both the EAD and DBL were significantly higher in the revision group compared to the no-revision group (P <.001 for both). We did not observe an association between other conventional radiographical assessments and revision surgery. Multivariable analysis revealed that the EAD and DBL were independently correlated with revision surgery.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that disc bulging, particularly as measured by EAD, is a significant predictor of revision surgery following decompression for LSCS. These findings highlight the importance of pre-operative assessment of disc bulging in predicting surgical outcomes and optimizing patient selection for decompressive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40528017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.