Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528014›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Reduction of metal artifact from cryoprobe using tilt CT scanning with metal artifact reduction algorithms for CT-guided cryoablation.

Tomohiro Inoue, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Yusuke Matsui, Shota Tanaka, Takatsugu Yamauchi, Toshihiro Iguchi, Koji Tomita, Mayu Uka, Mitsugi Honda, Takao Hiraki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomohiro InoueDepartment of Medical Support, Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. inoue-tmhr@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1818-8904
Noriyuki UmakoshiDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Shota TanakaDepartment of Medical Support, Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Takatsugu YamauchiDepartment of Medical Support, Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Toshihiro IguchiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Koji TomitaDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Mayu UkaDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Mitsugi HondaDepartment of Medical Support, Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Takao HirakiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

Bayer Yakuhin BASJ20210412014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a simple and useful method for monitoring during cryoablation; however, image quality is degraded by artifacts caused by the cryoprobe used during treatment. We evaluated the effectiveness of combining tilt scanning and single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) to improve image quality. A cryoprobe was inserted into an agar phantom, and CT scans were performed at various angles (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) with and without metal artifact reduction. The relative artifact index, calculated using the CT value standard deviation, was used to evaluate the intensity. The strongest tip artifacts occurred at 0°. The relative artifact index decreased with increasing tilt angles. The tilted scanning reduced artifacts extending beyond the cryoprobe tip, but SEMAR demonstrated a limited effect on artifact reduction. The tilted scanning method may be a useful approach for improving the image quality around the cryoprobe without increasing the exposure dose.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsCryosurgeryMetalsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedPhantoms, ImagingMetalsArtifact reductionComputed tomography-guided cryoablationCryoprobe artifactsSingle-energy metal artifact reductionTilted computed tomography scanning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.