ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Reduction of metal artifact from cryoprobe using tilt CT scanning with metal artifact reduction algorithms for CT-guided cryoablation.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subtraction-based Stepwise computed tomography post-processing with probabilistically adjusted thresholding for fat-ice demarcation: an in situ study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is a simple and useful method for monitoring during cryoablation; however, image quality is degraded by artifacts caused by the cryoprobe used during treatment. We evaluated the effectiveness of combining tilt scanning and single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) to improve image quality. A cryoprobe was inserted into an agar phantom, and CT scans were performed at various angles (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) with and without metal artifact reduction. The relative artifact index, calculated using the CT value standard deviation, was used to evaluate the intensity. The strongest tip artifacts occurred at 0°. The relative artifact index decreased with increasing tilt angles. The tilted scanning reduced artifacts extending beyond the cryoprobe tip, but SEMAR demonstrated a limited effect on artifact reduction. The tilted scanning method may be a useful approach for improving the image quality around the cryoprobe without increasing the exposure dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40528014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.