ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
HAPIR: a refined Hallmark gene set-based machine learning approach for predicting immunotherapy response in cancer patients.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet the response rate remains limited, with only about 30% of solid tumor patients benefiting. Identifying reliable biomarkers to predict ICIs response remains a significant challenge. In this study, we proposed a refined Hallmark gene set-based Approach for Predicting Immunotherapy Response (HAPIR). Through comprehensive multi-cohort analyses encompassing six TIGER cohorts (n = 352) and TCGA-SKCM (n = 472), we validated the optimal performance of HAPIR. Using transcriptomic data from a training cohort, we firstly refined seven Hallmark gene sets enriched with differentially expressed genes between responder and non-responder patients. Then, a logistic regression model trained based on the activities of these gene sets demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUROC = 0.778) in ten-fold cross-validation, significantly outperforming 13 existing biomarkers, including PD-1 (AUROC = 0.678) and PD-L1 (AUROC = 0.54). HAPIR's robustness was further validated in the validation set and four independent cohorts spanning multiple cancer types (melanoma, NSCLC, and STAD), consistently achieving average AUROC = 0.745. Beyond well-known biomarkers, HAPIR surpassed both gene-based and alternative gene set-based models. Importantly, HAPIR scores correlated significantly with patient survival and effectively recapitulated the immune microenvironment, enabling the prediction of potential drug targets and drug candidates to overcome immunotherapy resistance. In conclusion, HAPIR is a promising tool for predicting ICIs response and guiding the development of new immunotherapy strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.