ArticleScientific data2025
The Austronesian and the Micronesian Comparative Dictionaries as CLDF datasets.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Austronesian Comparative Dictionary has served as an important resource for the comparative study of Austronesian languages since Robert Blust started its compilation in 1990. Likewise, the Micronesian Comparative Dictionary - an online database of Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions previously published in Oceanic Linguistics by Byron Bender and colleagues - is an important reference point for comparative Linguistics. The legacy, online versions of both dictionaries share an uncertain future, and both have not been available in a structured format, amenable to quantitative methods. Thus, to preserve the content of both dictionaries for the scientific record and to increase interoperability of the data, we undertook a conversion of the dictionaries to CLDF datasets. While programmatic access to the data within each dictionary already provides a new level of usability, the true potential of data in CLDF lies in interoperability across datasets. This is particularly useful for the two dictionaries presented here, because Micronesian languages belong to the Austronesian family and so the Micronesian data could potentially complement the Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. With the CLDF datasets we lay the groundwork for tackling this challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.