Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40527912›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Flow parsing as causal source separation allows fast and parallel object and self-motion estimation.

Malte Scherff, Markus Lappe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malte ScherffDepartment of Psychology & Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. malte.scherff@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-2756
Markus LappeDepartment of Psychology & Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG La 952-10EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies (H2020 Excellent Science - Future and Emerging Technologies) 951910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optic flow, the retinal pattern of motion experienced during self-motion, contains information about one's direction of heading. The global pattern due to self-motion is locally confounded when moving objects are present, and the flow is the sum of components due to the different causal sources. Nonetheless, humans can accurately retrieve information from such flow, including the direction of heading and the scene-relative motion of an object. Flow parsing is a process speculated to allow the brain's sensitivity to optic flow to separate the causal sources of retinal motion in information due to self-motion and information due to object motion. In a computational model that retrieves object and self-motion information from optic flow, we implemented flow parsing based on heading likelihood maps, whose distributions indicate the consistency of parts of the flow with self-motion. This allows for concurrent estimation of heading, detecting and localizing a moving object, and estimating its scene-relative motion. We developed a paradigm that allows the model to perform all these estimations while systematically varying the object's contribution to the flow field. Simulations of that paradigm show that the model replicates many aspects of human performance, including the dependence of heading estimation on object speed and direction.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionOptic FlowComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID40527912
PMCPMC12174319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.