ArticleScientific data2025
An open-access EEG dataset for speech decoding: Exploring the role of articulation and coarticulation.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual speech enhances phoneme separability in human superior temporal gyrus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- An open-access EEG dataset for speech decoding: Exploring the role of articulation and coarticulation.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Facilitates Neural Speech Decoding.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) holds promise for brain-computer interface (BCI) devices as a non-invasive measure of neural activity. With increased attention to EEG-based BCI systems, publicly available datasets incorporating the complex stimuli found in naturalistic speech are necessary to establish a common standard of performance within the BCI community. Effective solutions must overcome noise in the EEG signal and remain reliable across sessions and stimuli that reflect types of real-world linguistic complexity without overfitting to a dataset or task. We present two validated datasets (N=8 and N=16) for classification at the phoneme and word level and by the articulatory properties of phonemes. EEG signals were recorded from 64 channels while subjects listened to and repeated six consonants and five vowels. Individual phonemes were combined in different phonetic environments to produce coarticulated variation in 40 consonant-vowel pairs, 20 real words, and 20 pseudowords. Phoneme pairs and words were presented during a control condition and during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whether stimulation would augment the EEG signal associated with specific articulatory processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.