ReviewMedicine2025
Surgical removal of ingested magnets in children: A retrospective clinical analysis of 16 patients and review of the literature.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and therapeutic experiences of magnetic foreign body ingestion in children: a single-center retrospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Is surgery always necessary for multiple magnet ingestion in children?-evidence for an endoscopy-first approach.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical features and surgical treatment of magnetic bead ingestion in children: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Enteroenteric Fistula Following Multiple Magnet Ingestion in an Adult: Case Report, Literature Review and Management Algorithm.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion is a common pediatric emergency. Notably, the inadvertent ingestion of magnets is frequently initially asymptomatic, only to be detected days later when gastrointestinal damage has already manifested. We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 16 pediatric patients who underwent surgical removal of ingested magnets at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. This review encompassed the patients' demographic characteristics, the interval from ingestion to admission, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, the type and number of ingested magnets, location of injury, surgical interventions, and postoperative outcomes. The study sample comprised 11 boys and 5 girls, with a median age of 3.6 years (range, 1-14 years). The predominant presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (n = 6), abdominal pain accompanied by vomiting (n = 3), and a combination of fever, diarrhea, and seizure (n = 1); 6 patients were asymptomatic. Neodymium bead magnets were the most commonly ingested type, noted in 13 patients. All 16 patients underwent either laparoscopic exploration or laparotomy due to clinical deterioration or confirmed complications. For 13 patients, magnet removal with primary bowel repair was performed, whereas in 3 patients, magnet removal combined with segmental resection and primary bowel repair was necessary. Fifteen of the 16 patients recovered without complications; however, wound infections occurred in 2 patients, and 1 patient required adhesiolysis and segmental resection of the jejunum due to intestinal obstruction. One patient died of septic shock. The 15 surviving patients are currently in excellent condition. Magnet ingestion by children, particularly when multiple magnets are involved, constitutes a surgical emergency. Timely identification and prompt surgical intervention are critical to preventing severe complications. Improved educational and preventive strategies (including public awareness initiatives regarding the hazards of small magnets) are essential to reducing the frequency of these incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.