Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40527805›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

The study of an integrated diabetes prediction model based on user-defined risk decision making strategy.

Liyan Ning, Jianbin Su, Kui Li, Jiancheng Dong, Hongjian Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liyan NingAdministrating Office (Information Center), Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, China.
Jianbin SuEndocrinology Department, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, China.
Kui LiInformation Center, Nantong Bigdata Research Key Laboratory for Rehabilitation Medicine, Nantong, China.
Jiancheng DongDepartment of Medical Information, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, China.
Hongjian LuThe President's Office, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8144-7788

Funding

the Research Project on Basic research project of Nantong Science and Technology Program JC12022045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes, as a typical chronic disease, seriously affects the quality of life and economic burden of patients and their families. If the early and accurate prediction of diabetes can be realized according to patients' health-data, the development of diabetes would be effectively prevented or mitigated. The existing diabetes prediction models have achieved better prediction results. However, noise and high-dimensional nonlinear features in health-data may still be important factors affecting the performance of prediction models and deserve further research. Aiming at these, we propose an integrated diabetes prediction model based on user-defined risk decision making strategies, named FDNN. The model tandemly integrates modules for data-preprocessing, diabetes prediction models based on different features, and user-defined risk decision making strategies. The problems of data-standardization, data noise filtering, and high-dimensional nonlinear features learning are solved hierarchically in the model. Finally, based on the PIMA dataset, FDNN is compared with baselines such as SVM, Logistic, random forest, and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT). The experimental results show that noise does exist in the diabetes dataset and the noise is an important factor affecting the prediction performance. FDNN with feature selection is proposed to mitigate the impact of noise in diabetes dataset on prediction performance. In the dataset with noise, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of FDNN are 0.9278, 0.6667, 0.8312, and 0.8475 respectively, which are better than the comparison algorithms. It is 6.75%, 11.92%, 5.79%, and 0.83% better than GBDT respectively, with more accurate and stable prediction performance.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDiabetes MellitusDecision MakingDecision TreesHumansRisk Assessmentdecision making strategydeep neural networkdiabetes predictionfeatures selectionintegrated model

Identifiers

PMID40527805
PMCPMC12173292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.