Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40527769›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Evaluation of continuous improvement effect of perioperative nursing quality in Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Minshu Zhou, Haiou Qi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minshu ZhouNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the clinical effect of continuous improvement of perioperative nursing quality in patients with Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. A total of 222 patients who received Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in our hospital from January to June 2021 were selected as the control group. From July to December 2021, 259 patients who received Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the perioperative nursing quality continuous improvement model were selected as the improvement group, and the nursing effects of the 2 groups of patients were compared. The placement time of the patients, the incidence of the second berth and the robotic arm collision with the body in the improvement group were significantly less than those in the control group (P < .05); the incidence of short-term postoperative adverse events in the improved group (3.47%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (8.11%) (x2 = 7.096, P = .011). Patients in the improvement group had significantly higher satisfaction with nursing services than the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (x2 = 9.845, P = .002). The continuous improvement of perioperative nursing quality of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can not only expose the surgical site to the greatest extent, ensure the smoothness of the operation, but also effectively reduce the incidence of adverse events and improve patient satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPerioperative NursingProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsQuality ImprovementRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studiescontinuous improvement of nursing qualityDa Vinci robotlaparoscopyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40527769
PMCPMC12173331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.