ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Current perspectives on endovascular therapy for large core ischemic stroke.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tailored Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Strategies by Imaging Type and Thrombectomy Availability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, patients with ischemic stroke and an extensive region of irreversibly injured ischemic core were excluded from endovascular thrombectomy trials due to concerns about limited benefit and high procedural risk. This has fundamentally changed with the publication of five strongly positive randomized controlled trials in this group of patients since 2022 and a sixth trial that showed consistent trends and was positive in per protocol analysis and long-term follow-up. This narrative review summarizes the key findings of these trials, including imaging selection criteria, functional and safety outcomes, and long-term benefits. Across trials, thrombectomy consistently improved functional outcomes at 3-months and 12-months. Absolute functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) rates were lower than the trials that enrolled patients with smaller ischemic core volumes, but still significantly favored thrombectomy. Safety outcomes demonstrated a reduction in mortality with EVT and no significant increase in rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. While guidelines are being updated to include large core thrombectomy, real-world decision-making remains complex, requiring careful consideration of patient-specific factors, including functional status, infarct location, and patient preferences. Future research should focus on exploring adjunctive therapies and accelerated systems of care to further improve outcomes in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.