ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between self-stigma and diabetic complications in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association between self-stigma evaluated using the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale (SSS-J) and diabetic complications, such as diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD).
designCross-sectional study.
settingOne university hospital and one clinic in Fukuoka, Japan.
participantsPeople (age ≥20 years) with type 2 diabetes receiving outpatient care, who were treated by diabetologists, and completed the SSS-J questionnaire (n=259). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the level of self-stigma assessed using the SSS-J. The presence of DR and DKD was evaluated as secondary outcomes.
resultsA positive correlation was found between self-stigma and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (
conclusionsThe presence of DR was more strongly associated with self-stigma than DKD. Although the causality between self-stigma and the presence of DR could not be elucidated due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, the present study suggests that addressing self-stigma may aid in glycaemic management and the prevention of DR, emphasising the need for healthcare providers to recognise self-stigma as a barrier to optimal diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.