ArticleBMJ open2025
Heated tobacco product use prevalence and temporal trends among the German population: a series of representative cross-sectional household surveys, 2018-2023.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of E-cigarette and tobacco use on heart rate variability: a case-control study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Relative affordability of heated tobacco products and cigarettes: a cross-country comparative analysis of 55 countries.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Global Heated Tobacco Product User Estimates, 2014-2024: Descriptive Surveillance Study Using Manufacturer Disclosures.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHeated tobacco products (HTPs) are electronic devices that heat tobacco instead of burning it to produce an inhalable aerosol. This study aimed to investigate usage patterns, sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, as well as co-use characteristics of people who use HTPs within the German population to inform interventions and preventive measures.
methodsWe conducted analysis with pooled cross-sectional data from the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA) from June 2018 till November 2023. We estimated weighted, descriptive and bimonthly data on current and ever HTP usage and descriptive data on user patterns. To analyse the variance between people who ever versus people who never used HTPs in relation to user characteristics, we performed χ² tests and calculated percentages and CIs.
resultsThe proportions of both people who currently use and people who ever used HTPs have increased from 2018 (current user: 0.1% [95%CI: <0.01 to 0.35]; ever user: 1.9% [95%CI: 1.36 to 2.60]) to 2023 (current user: 1% [95%CI: 0.62 to 1.52]; ever user: 8.4% [95%CI: 7.25 to 9.65]). Compared with people who never used HTPs, people who ever used HTPs were more likely to be male, younger and living in urban regions. On average, people who currently use HTPs use 7.3 (SD=7.4) tobacco sticks per day. IQOS was the most used brand, and 56% used HTPs with aroma technologies. The main reason to use HTPs was 'because they are less harmful than tobacco that is burned'.
conclusionHTP use has increased in Germany, particularly among younger males in urban areas. Public health interventions should target these demographics, focusing on raising awareness about potential health risks. The ban on aroma components in Germany may reduce the appeal for new users. Continuous monitoring is essential to assess the long-term impact of HTPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.