ArticleBMJ open2025
Experiences of postnatal contraceptive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multimethods cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown period on access to postnatal contraception (PNC) and wider postnatal care and to explore the experiences of PNC care within the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) Integrated Care System (ICS) during the same period.
designThis study reports a subanalysis of the NENC Postnatal Contraception (PoCo) study, an online survey of a convenience sample of women in the NENC ICS who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023.
settingWomen who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023 in the NENC ICS.
participantsOut of the total 2509 eligible participants who completed the PoCo survey, women who delivered in April-June 2020, April-June 2021 and April-June 2022 were included within this subanalysis, resulting in 457 eligible survey responses. There were no additional exclusion criteria. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were PNC uptake and number of healthcare professional contacts during the postnatal period. Secondary outcome measures were self-reported experiences of PNC care.
resultsWomen who delivered in April-June 2020 had fewer postnatal contacts than women who delivered in subsequent non-lockdown cohorts and were less likely to be offered PNC prior to discharge. There were no significant differences in relation to PNC uptake. In qualitative analyses, several women who delivered in 2020 highlighted COVID-19 as a factor perceived to be associated with poor postnatal care. Across all three groups, experiences of PNC care were diverse; feeling pressured to accept PNC was frequently reported.
conclusionsWhile the first COVID-19 lockdown appears to have had a significant impact on women's experiences of postnatal care, this did not result in a substantive decrease in PNC provision, likely reflecting pre-existing shortcomings. These women and families may benefit from additional support postpandemic to mitigate the potential life course implications of restricted support in the postpartum period, and policy-makers and healthcare providers should continue to explore innovative and patient-centred approaches to improving PNC provision. Future research should continue to evaluate the longer-term impacts of these changes in non-pandemic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.