SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Comparative effectiveness of interventions to facilitate deprescription of benzodiazepines and other sedative hypnotics: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of physical exercise on sleep quality in patients with psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effective deprescribing strategies for reducing potentially inappropriate medications and improving economic outcomes in community-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Brief intervention for inappropriate z-hypnotics use in older adults: a before and after intervention study in primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Deprescribing benzodiazepine hypnotics and Z-drugs: are DORAs the answer?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Older Adults Seeking Care in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Development of a Women's Empowerment Nurse-Led Group Intervention for Benzodiazepine and Z-Hypnotic Deprescription in Primary Healthcare: Results of a Co-Creation Process.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Adverse Events in Psychiatric Outpatients Taking Hypnotics: Higher Real-World Frequencies Than Those Listed in Package Inserts.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Article
- Pathways to chronic benzodiazepine use: a qualitative study of user and professional perspectives.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Role of gender, age and rurality in benzodiazepine consumption in Catalonia, 2018-2022: a retrospective longitudinal drug utilisation study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review evidence from randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of strategies to deprescribe benzodiazepines and closely related sedative hypnotics (BSH).
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and CENTRAL, searched from inception to August 2024, and reference lists of included studies and similar systematic reviews. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Eligible studies randomised adults using BSH for insomnia to interventions aimed at deprescribing BSH, strategies to implement these interventions in healthcare settings, or usual care or placebo.
methodsReviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen search results, extract data, and assess risk of bias. Similar interventions were grouped together, frequentist random effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
resultsThe review identified 58 publications reporting on 49 unique trials with more than 39 000 patients. Interventions were classified into the following categories: tapering, patient education, physician education, combined patient and physician education, cognitive behavioural therapy, medication review, mindfulness, motivational interviewing, pharmacist led interventions, and drug assisted tapering and withdrawal. Low certainty evidence suggests that education of patients (144 (95% confidence interval 61 to 246) more per 1000 patients), medication review (104 (34 to 191) more), and a pharmacist led educational intervention (491 (234 to 928) more) may increase the proportion of patients who discontinue BSH compared with usual care. Moderate certainty evidence suggests that education of patients probably has little or no effect on physical function, mental health, and signs and symptoms of insomnia. No evidence was found regarding these other outcomes for medication review or for the pharmacist led educational intervention. No compelling evidence was found that other interventions may help patients to discontinue BSH. Moreover, no high or moderate certainty evidence was found that any of the interventions caused an increase in dropouts. Finally, low certainty evidence suggests that multicomponent interventions may be more effective at facilitating discontinuation of BSH than single component interventions.
conclusionThe evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to discontinue BSH is of low certainty. Educating patients, doing medication reviews, and a pharmacist led educational intervention may increase the proportion of patients who discontinue BSH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.