Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40527527›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

Supporting local ownership of transition processes: a key pathway to sustaining the HIV response.

Lindsay Moore Murphy, Deborah Valerie Stenoien, Eliza Love, Hilary Mwale, Vi Vu, Aishling Thurow, Damian Walker, Monica Jordan, Allyala Nandakumar, Sarah Konopka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsay Moore MurphyManagement Sciences for Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0255-2334
Deborah Valerie StenoienInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA debbie.stenoien@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7126-6613
Eliza LoveManagement Sciences for Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Hilary MwaleHill & Associates, Lusaka, Zambia.
Vi VuInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Aishling ThurowManagement Sciences for Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Damian WalkerManagement Sciences for Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Monica JordanInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Allyala NandakumarInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah KonopkaManagement Sciences for Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, an increasing number of countries have made progress towards HIV epidemic control, yet decreasing donor funding and insufficient domestic investments threaten these strides. Within this context, the global community is interested in how to successfully transition responsibility for HIV services from donor-funded programmes to local ownership within the broader healthcare system.This analysis explores how to centre local leadership in transition processes to ensure long-term sustainability of HIV programmes, including moving from external to domestic financing. Existing frameworks show broad consensus on the core elements required to examine readiness and support transition processes; however, many of these frameworks do not address how to ensure that transitions are locally owned. An examination of HIV programmes in Vietnam and Zambia, supported by previous evidence, presented four specific lessons on promoting local ownership and local leadership of transition processes. First, sustainable transitions rely on strong locally led health systems and health system functions. Second, the prioritisation of HIV service and system integration must be locally led to ensure harmonisation with national health sector reforms and priorities. Third, capacity strengthening and consistent engagement with civil society, especially during decision-making processes, can strengthen the sustainability of transition efforts. Finally, decentralising planning and integration processes to regional platforms and actively involving subnational actors is essential in contexts with decentralised health systems. The global community can embrace these lessons to support locally led transitions and improve sustainable HIV services in the long term.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHIV InfectionsOwnershipHumansLeadershipVietnamZambiaGlobal HealthHealth systemsHIV

Identifiers

PMID40527527
PMCPMC12182021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.