ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2026
Integration of omics data in the diagnosis and therapy of glioblastoma.
Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging single-cell and spatial omics for brain tumour insights to improve therapeutic strategies.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- A Genomically Tailored Multiagent Precision Medicine Clinical Trial for Adults with Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Integration of omics data in the diagnosis and therapy of glioblastoma.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the 2016 update of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, omics data have been officially integrated into the diagnostic process for glioblastoma, the most prevalent and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. This review will examine the current and future integration of omics data in both the diagnosis and therapy of glioblastomas. The current clinical use of omics data primarily focuses on genomics for determining the IDH- and H3-wildtype status of the tumor, and on epigenomics, such as assessing MGMT promoter methylation status as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. However, it can be anticipated that the usage and importance of omics data will likely increase in the future. This work highlights how omics technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of glioblastoma, particularly of its extensive heterogeneity. This enhanced understanding has not only improved diagnostic accuracy but has also facilitated the identification of new predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. It is likely that the ongoing integration of omics data will transform many aspects of the diagnostic process, including sample acquisition. Additionally, omics data will be integrated into future glioblastoma treatment procedures, with possible applications ranging from identifying potential therapeutic targets to selecting individual treatment plans. The implications of the ongoing integration of omics data for clinical routine, future classification systems, and trial design are also discussed in this review, outlining the pivotal role omics data play in shaping future glioblastoma diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.