ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission: A Case-Control Study.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several health care workers (HCWs) succumbed to infection during the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In some cases, HCWs were even blamed for ignorance of standard operating procedures while using personal protective equipment (PPE). This case-control study evaluated the effectiveness of PPE in prevention of transmission by comparing attitudes toward use of PPE. In a retrospective 1:1 case-control design, HCWs who contracted COVID-19 infection were identified as cases and telephonically contacted. Those HCWs who were working in the same patient care area but were not COVID-19 positive before nor at that point in time when the paired case had tested positive were included as controls. Responses around the use of PPE were collected on an indigenously developed questionnaire on a Likert scale using a mix of questions. Those infected with COVID-19 (cases) were younger, felt that single gloves were sufficient, believed that full PPE was not as effective in preventing infection, and did not prefer using a face shield when in comparison with the controls who believed otherwise. The cases reported greater discomfort while using PPE and were more likely to remove protective equipment because of discomfort. The controls were more likely to be vaccinated and be following the WHO protocol for hand hygiene, although these differences were not statistically significant. The differences in attitudes and practices between cases and controls revealed characteristics that could be associated with transmission. Vaccination, improved hand-hygiene practices, and an emphasis on eye protection with face shields might ensure a healthier frontline workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.