ArticleThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2025
Pearls and Pitfalls of Intrathecal Amphotericin B Therapy for Refractory Coccidioidal Meningitis in Children: An Illustrative Pediatric Case Series.
Article in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rising burden of severe pediatric coccidioidomycosis: a 25-year single-center study.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2026Observational
- Drug Interactions for Inhibition or Killing ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pediatric Coccidioidal Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Proportional Synthesis of Cases Reported in the Fluconazole Era (2000-2025).Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIncidence of pediatric coccidioidomycosis has risen over the last 20 years, and coccidioidal meningitis is the most severe form of disseminated disease. Intrathecal amphotericin B deoxycholate (IT AmBd) has historically improved outcomes and remains a mainstay of therapy when response to azole therapy is inadequate. However, the dosing, route of administration and duration of therapy in young pediatric patients pose unique challenges due to their anatomy, inability to communicate and the need for hospital-based administration. We present 4 instructive cases over 30 years to provide guidance on the use of IT AmBd.
methodsCase information was abstracted from the electronic health record at University of California Los Angeles. Literature review was conducted to look for additional cases on Pubmed with relevant search terms.
resultsWe present 4 cases including 2 patients with successful outcomes and 2 who did not survive. Starting doses, administration routes, complications and neurosurgical challenges are described. Patients had prolonged hospitalizations as the ability to administer outpatient IT amphotericin B was minimal. Therefore, more rapid dose escalation and weaning, with a shorter overall duration of therapy, was needed than described for adults. IT treatment was considered an initial stabilizing measure while attempting to optimize azole monotherapy. Cisternal administration is preferred but remains a logistical challenge.
conclusionIntrathecal AmBd remains an important treatment option in pediatric patients with refractory coccidioidal meningitis; however, due to unique administration, challenges may be more of a temporizing measure rather than definitive prolonged therapy. Further experience and multidisciplinary care are needed to reduce mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.