ArticlePloS one2025
Obstetric and newborn outcomes of mothers with and without HIV infection in Anaka general hospital in Northern Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of maternal HIV infection on pregnancy and labor complication and perinatal health outcomes: a South African retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen of reproductive age constitute a significant proportion of the global HIV burden, with millions becoming pregnant while on lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART). Although ART has dramatically improved maternal and child health outcomes, concerns persist regarding its safety in pregnancy. This study compares obstetric and neonatal outcomes between women with and without HIV infection at Anaka General Hospital, a rural hospital in northern Uganda.
methodsA hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study at Anaka General Hospital in northern Uganda was conducted from July 2020 to June 2023. A total of 914 delivery records were included, sampled using systematic random sampling from the hospital maternity register. Data were extracted from maternity and neonatal records using a structured tool. Associations between HIV status and obstetric or neonatal outcomes were assessed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and independent sample t-tests for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsOf the 914 participants included in the study 38 (4.2%) were HIV-positive. The odds of congenital anomalies were significantly higher among infants born to HIV-positive women compared with HIV-negative women (adjusted odds ratio = 9.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.72-55.48, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in maternal or neonatal outcomes between the two groups.
conclusionHIV infection was significantly associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies, while other obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. We recommend enhanced prenatal monitoring and early fetal screening among HIV-positive pregnant women on dolutegravir-based ART. Additionally, prospective studies are needed to better understand the contribution of dolutegravir and maternal factors to congenital anomalies in HIV-exposed pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.