ArticlePloS one2025
Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Calotes and Uromastyx in the Cholistan Desert, Pakistan, based on COI gene analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Island vs. Mainland: Genetic Divergence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cholistan Desert of Pakistan harbors unique reptile diversity, including ecologically significant agamid lizards of the genera Calotes and Uromastyx, yet their genetic structure remains poorly understood. This study presents the first mitochondrial DNA barcode assessment of these taxa in the region, analyzing 658 bp of the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene from 19 specimens collected across seven desert sites. We employed a combination of distance-based (p-distance, K2P) and phylogenetic methods (Maximum Likelihood, Bayesian Inference) to evaluate genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships. Results revealed pronounced divergence between genera (24-30% K2P distance), with Uromastyx populations showing remarkably low intraspecific variation (0-1%), contrasting with higher diversity in Calotes (0-14%). Demographic analyses suggested stable populations (Tajima's D = 0.93, p > 0.10), though haplotype networks indicated limited gene flow (Nm = 0.12). Our findings: (1) provide the first genetic baseline for these ecologically important desert lizards, (2) identify Uromastyx as potentially more vulnerable to genetic erosion, and (3) demonstrate the utility of COI barcoding for rapid biodiversity assessment in understudied arid ecosystems. The study highlights the Cholistan Desert as an evolutionary significant zone for agamid lizards while underscoring the need for integrated taxonomic approaches to address potential cryptic diversity. All sequence data are publicly available (GenBank PQ896696-PQ896705) to support future conservation genomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.