ArticlePloS one2025
Aspirations to study medicine, perceptions of a good doctor, and their influence on specialty choice among medical students.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking stereotypes or making compromises? gender, income, and the unequal landscape of medical specialty choice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Determinants of surgical specialty interest among clinical-year medical students in Syria: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Key factors influencing medical residency choice among medical graduates.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Education Research: Choosing Wisely: A Mixed-Methods Study of Career Choices of Students Completing Advanced Neurology Electives.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Exploring factors influencing medical specialty choice among undergraduates in The Gambia: a situated expectancy-value theory approach.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Student motivations and identity in biomedical sciences: a social cognitive careers theory approach.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional investigation of trend in career specialty preference among clinical year medical undergraduates, including factors influencing preferences and discouragement.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecialty decision-making among medical students reflects a complex interplay of motivations, evolving perceptions, and experiences during medical training. This study explores how students' initial motivations, views on what makes a good doctor, and academic progression influence their specialty preferences.
methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted at VinUniversity, a not-for-profit medical school in Vietnam. Quantitative surveys were completed by 155 students across Years 1-4 (79.5% response rate), and 27 students participated in in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis to explore identity formation and specialty choice.
resultsAltruism was the most cited factor influencing specialty choice, with "desire to help people" rated highest (4.08 ± 1.14). Students' perceptions of essential doctor qualities evolved over time. Younger students valued creativity (p = 0.035) and innovation (p = 0.022) more than seniors, reflecting a shift toward practicality in later years. Specialty preferences aligned with professional values: students favoring surgery rated work ethic (p = 0.029), collaboration (p = 0.006), and adaptability (p = 0.044) higher than those preferring internal medicine. Students inclined toward pediatrics or psychiatry prioritized empathy and communication, while those choosing surgery emphasized technical skill and decisiveness. Female students rated prestige as more influential than male students (p = 0.049). Qualitative data revealed that clinical exposure and self-reflection helped students refine their specialty choices by aligning personal traits with perceived specialty demands.
conclusionMedical students' specialty preferences are shaped by their initial motivations, developing perceptions of good doctor qualities, and experiences throughout training. These findings underscore the need for medical curricula and mentorship to address the evolving identity and values of students, supporting more informed and aligned specialty choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.