ArticlePLoS medicine2025
Vaccination strategies, public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccine TAK-003: A modeling case study in Thailand.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dengue Vaccines in a Changing Epidemiological Landscape: Current Evidence, Unresolved Challenges, and Public Health Considerations.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Article
- The need for balanced dengue vaccine protection: Insights from Thai surveillance data on four serotypes.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Methods for estimating the burden of acute tropical infectious diseases: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Optimizing dengue vaccination strategies.PLoS medicine · 2026Review
- Correction: Vaccination strategies, public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccine TAK-003: A modeling case study in Thailand.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDengue is an increasing global problem associated with negative health and economic impacts. Vaccination is an important measure to reduce the significant public health and economic burden caused by dengue. Our study assesses the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of a new dengue vaccine, TAK-003, using Thailand as a case study. METHODS AND
findingsWe developed a dynamic transmission model with both host and vector populations, 4 serotype-specific infections, seasonality, and other key elements of dengue natural history. We estimated efficacy of TAK-003 from the DEN-301 trial. We first used the model to determine the optimal cohort age for different vaccination strategies with TAK-003, based on Thai dengue epidemiology. Secondly, we assessed the public health impact of a pragmatic strategy integrating TAK-003 into an existing national immunization program in Thailand. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a societal perspective using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) over a 20-year horizon. TAK-003 is estimated to prevent 41%-57% of symptomatic cases and 47%-70% of hospitalizations, with the greatest impact observed when routinely vaccinating children aged 6 years with 10 additional catch-up cohorts. This strategy resulted in 104,415 fewer DALYs and savings of US$1,786 million. If introduced into the national immunization program at 11 years of age (alongside the existing human papillomavirus vaccine), TAK-003 is estimated to prevent 44% of symptomatic cases and 53% of hospitalizations. This strategy prevented 87,715 DALYs and saved US$1,346 million. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were robust. The main limitations were inherent to the assumptions and simplifications made in the model, which are unavoidable when approximating the impact of vaccination in the real world.
conclusionsTAK-003 can considerably reduce dengue burden and lead to cost savings in Thailand. These benefits can be maximized by identifying optimal age cohorts for vaccination and adding catch-up programs. Our model can be used to assess the vaccination impact in other dengue-endemic countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.