ArticlePloS one2025
Continuous respiratory rate monitoring through temporal fusion of ECG and PPG signals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Monitoring in Motion: An Overview of Wearable Methods and Algorithmic Approaches for Reliable Assessment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Comparison of Techniques for Respiratory Rate Extraction from Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Parameter-Efficient Deep Learning Models for Vital Sign Estimation From PPG.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory rate (RR) is an important vital sign indicating various pathological conditions, such as clinical deterioration, pneumonia, and adverse cardiac arrest. Traditional RR measurement methods are normally intrusive and inconvenient for ubiquitous continuous monitoring. There have been studies on RR estimation by extracting respiratory modulated components (RMCs) from wearable accessible noninvasive cardiovascular signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or/and photoplethysmogram (PPG), with RR estimated from each RMC or fused RMCs derived from either ECG or PPG. However, there is few study on robust continuous RR estimation with the combination of all kinds of RMCs from both ECG and PPG in the time domain. In this study, we propose the temporal fusion of RMCs extracted from both ECG and PPG signals to estimate RR with the aim to improve estimation performance. We extracted six RMCs from ECG and PPG, identified those RMCs of high quality with the respiratory quality index, fused the identified ones into one respiratory signal with principal component analysis, and estimated the RR from the fused signal. Validation on two public datasets - the Capnobase dataset (42 subjects) and the BIDMC dataset (53 subjects) - showed that the proposed method attained a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.39 breaths/min and 3.29 breaths/min for RR estimation, respectively, achieving an average 11.61% reduction in MAE compared to existing state-of-the-art approaches. This demonstrates that temporal fusion of the RMCs of wearable ECG and PPG can improve the performance of RR estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.