ArticlePloS one2025
Status and associated factors of psychological resilience of Chinese medical aid team members under public health emergencies in a cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChinese medical aid team members (CMATMs) play an important role in the implementation of China's foreign health aid strategy. However, there is no research on the status and influencing factors of their psychological resilience.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the current status and influencing factors of psychological resilience of CMATMs.
methodsFrom 3rd December, 2024-25th December, 2024, a convenience sampling method was used. Demographic information questionnaire, Connor Davidson Resilience Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale were used to measure the psychological status of aid members. The influencing factors of psychological resilience were investigated through T-test, ANOVA, pearson correlation analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple linear regression.
resultsA total of 89 questionnaires were analysed. The total score of psychological resilience was 72.53 ± 13.48, which was generally at a good level. Pearson correlation analysis showed that self-efficacy was positively correlated with psychological resilience, while anxiety and depression were negatively correlated with psychological resilience. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that factors related to psychological resilience included professional title(B = 4.679, P = 0.001), loneliness(B = 4.973, P = 0.000), classification of hardship areas in recipient countries(B = 1.864, P = 0.004), family support(B = 3.110, P = 0.001), cultural and entertainment(B = 3.537, P = 0.001), and direct participation in public health emergency response missions in recipient countries(B = -3.775, P = 0.006).
conclusionsIn the context of public health emergencies, CMATMs are prone to great pressure, which has a negative impact on their psychological resilience. This study provides a theoretical basis for formulating psychological intervention measures for CMATMs. Policymakers or healthcare administrators should regular assess CMATMs ' mental health status, strengthen mental health training, mobilize family and social support networks, improve infrastructure and welfare security policies to help them establish a more adaptive defense mechanism and maintain good psychological resilience during foreign aid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.