Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40526609›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An understanding of the motivations that influence the beef cattle production systems adopted by farmers in central Mozambique.

Télis Adolfo Cumbe, Benedito Armando Cunguara, Concepta Margaret McManus, Antónia Mendes Paizano Alforma, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Télis Adolfo CumbeDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Benedito Armando CunguaraMinistry of Economy and Finance, Development Cabinet of Compact II, Mozambique.
Concepta Margaret McManusFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Antónia Mendes Paizano AlformaEstação Zootécnica de Angónia (EZA), Centro Regional da Zona Centro, Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique (IIAM), Ulónguè, Tete, Moçambique.
Júlio Otávio Jardim BarcellosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9858-1728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of factors that affect livestock production, from the farmers' perspective, is essential for improving efficiency in animal production. The objectives of this study were to analyse: i) the historical and current motivations for beef cattle production and ii) the situation of communal pasture areas. For data collection, semi-structured interviews were held with one hundred and one farmers in the districts of Angónia, Changara and Manica, in Mozambique. The results show that in Angónia and Changara districts, the primary motivation for starting beef cattle production was to keep cattle as a saving asset, whereas the primary motivation of Manica's farmers was to use cattle as draught animal power to expand crop production. These motivations remain the same over the years of the farmers' experience. Grazing areas have decreased over the years, mainly due to their occupation for crop production, and this perception was associated with the studied district (p = 0.004). The studied districts, particularly Angónia and Manica, have similar characteristics, suggesting that similar intervention models may be designed. The results raise the question of how to increase the productivity of beef cattle systems, primarily motivated by savings and animal traction while maintaining their characteristics, which are essential for the socio-economic conditions of the farmers. Overall, the study suggests that motivations for beef cattle production and the establishment of grazing areas should be considered when developing strategies and policies to improve these systems.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFarmersMotivationAnimalsCattleFemaleHumansMaleMozambique

Identifiers

PMID40526609
PMCPMC12173388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.