ArticleJCI insight2025
Large-scale survey, animal models, and computational modeling identify histological neurodegenerative biomarkers for traumatic optic neuropathy.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDTraumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is a leading cause of blindness following closed traumatic brain injury, with no effective treatments available. Previous interventional clinical trials were complicated by its low prevalence, variability in neurodegenerative severity, and unavailability of reliable biomarkers.METHODSWe analyzed data from 1,226 patients enrolled in the prospective National Multi-Center Collaborative Clinical Research Program of China (2017-2024) to establish a clinical profile and identify noninvasive biomarkers for neurodegenerative severity. Subgroup analysis of patients with monocular TON revealed potential biomarkers, including visual functional parameters, inner retinal thickness, and time postinjury.RESULTSThe ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness showed a strong correlation with retinal ganglion cell somata (R² = 0.87, P < 0.0001) and axon density (R² = 0.89, P < 0.0001) in a clinically relevant large animal model. Computational analysis demonstrated that using GCC thickness as a biomarker could substantially enhance the statistical power of clinical trials (by up to 4.5-fold), as verified by real-world data.CONCLUSIONThis study presents the largest epidemiological analysis of TON to date and establishes GCC thickness as a crucial biomarker for stratifying disease severity and improving the efficiency of clinical trials.TRIAL REGISTRATIONChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-OOC-17013437).FUNDINGNational Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1105500), Key Science and Technology Program of Wenzhou (Grant No. ZY2022021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82471080).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.