ArticlePloS one2025
Drone-assisted time-varying magnetic field analysis for fault diagnosis in grounding grids.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grounding grids are essential for ensuring the safety of power substations, but their performance can degrade due to corrosion, fractures, or other faults. Traditional fault diagnosis methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and require physical access to substations, posing safety risks. This paper introduces a drone-based approach for magnetic field sensing to diagnose grounding grid faults, significantly reducing operational risks and improving efficiency. However, the movement of the drone introduces time-varying electromagnetic interference (EMI) from substation equipment and the drone itself, complicating the isolation of grounding grid signals. To address this problem, we propose a time-varying un-mixing technique combined with the Fast Independent Component Analysis (FastICA) algorithm to effectively suppress the EMI and extract the grounding grid signals. Simulation results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed technique in separating grounding grid signals under time-varying conditions, outperforming the FastICA algorithm by 96.36% and the Independent Vector Analysis (IVA) by 41.17% at a block length of 4000 and [Formula: see text]. These results highlight the robustness and applicability of the proposed approach for real-world grounding grid fault diagnosis, ensuring accuracy and safety in EMI-rich environments. However, the performance of the proposed technique degrades at higher values of [Formula: see text], which represents the speed of the flying drone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.