ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2025
Understanding Brain Functional Dynamics Through Neural Koopman Operator With Control Mechanism.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the fundamental scientific problems in neuroscience is to have a good understanding of how cognition and behavior emerge from brain function. Since the neuroscience concept of cognitive control parallels the notion of system control in engineering, many computational models formulate the dynamics neural process into a dynamical system, where the hidden states of the complex neural system are modulated by energetic simulations. However, the human brain is a quintessential complex biological system. Current computation models either use neural networks to approximate the underlying dynamics, which makes it difficult to fully understand the system mechanics, or compromise to simplified linear models with very limited power to characterize non-linear and self-organized dynamics along with complex neural activities. To address this challenge, we devise an end-to-end deep model to identify the underlying brain dynamics based on Koopman operator theory, which allows us to model a complex non-linear system in an infinite-dimensional linear space. In the context of reverse engineering, we further propose a biology-inspired control module that adjusts the input (neural activity data) based on feedback to align brain dynamics with the underlying cognitive task. We have applied our deep model to predict cognitive states from a large scale of existing neuroimaging data by identifying the latent dynamic system of functional fluctuations. Promising results demonstrate the potential of establishing a system-level understanding of the intricate relationship between brain function and cognition through the landscape of explainable deep models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.