ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Building trust and equity in vaccine communication through community engagement.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Childhood immunization barriers and interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of access, delivery systems, and health literacy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Review
- Smart nanoparticle vaccines integrate nanotechnology artificial intelligence and immunoengineering for precision immunization.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Emerging Viral Zoonoses: Epidemiology, Vaccination Strategies, and Implications for Global Public Health.Vaccines · 2026Review
- One Health Perspective on the EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- "A single viral video can undo months of health education": social media, trust, and vaccine hesitancy in wartime Ukraine.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Mitigating Vaccine Disparities Through Faith-Based Intervention: A Pre-Post Analysis of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Knowledge and Acceptance in Socially Vulnerable Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Communities.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Bridging immunization and oral health: a role for paediatric dentists in mitigating vaccine hesitancy in Africa.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Future-Proofing European Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Market Access Practices Based on EU Learnings from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Interviews.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Geospatial disparities in post-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: Evidence from Chile beyond the national success.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Gotong royong and COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia: Linking communal values to collective immunity.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- From hesitancy to confidence: Shaping the future of vaccine messaging.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Podcasting and Blogging as Tools to Engage with the Public on the Topic of Cancer: Experience and Perspectives of the Public Interest Group on Cancer Research.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Recruiters' lived experiences in COVID-19 vaccine trials in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
That the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequities in health has been well studied in recent years, yet the ways in which the pandemic has also revealed existing inequities in communication, specifically health communication, is less well understood. Communities experience differing levels of basic literacy, health literacy, and access to information, as well as differing levels of trust in public health programs. Community engagement (CE) strategies are critical to support improved communication, trust, and equity in vaccination programs. This paper shares two real-world examples of impactful CE strategies from community-based programming to explore how well-designed community engagement strategies can support improved communication, trust, and equity in vaccination programming. Lessons learned from these programs highlight that vaccine communication programs should continuously engage communities to amplify community perspectives and voices to ensure sustained vaccine demand and uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.