ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSmall bowel motility can be quantified using cine MRI, but the influence of patient and imaging factors on motility scores remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patient and imaging factors affect motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.
resultsDeep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10
conclusionSmall bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited. KEY POINTS: Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40526355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.