ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Recent trends in self-reported utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test in Europe: analysis of the European Health Interview Surveys 2013-2015 and 2018-2020.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mailed faecal immunochemical test programmes and educational inequalities in colorectal cancer screening in Europe: a difference-in-differences analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Deprivation, Primary Care Physician Workload and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Across Italian Regions: An Ecological Spatial Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Colorectal Cancer-One Disease, Two Fires: Distinct Inflammatory Landscapes in Colon and Rectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite increasing implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs in Europe, utilization of screening tests has varied significantly over the years. We examined recent trends in the utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test (FOBT), the primary tests recommended for CRC screening, across European countries with various screening programs. Population-based data from the second and third waves of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) were analyzed to determine changes in utilization of fecal occult blood test within the preceding 2 years or colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years among people aged 50-74 years between 2013-2015 and 2018-2020. Absolute percentage changes (APC) in screening test use were calculated in each country and subgroup meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models to estimate the pooled APCs and their 95% confidence intervals across different categories of screening offers. A total of 234,251 respondents across 28 European countries were included in the analysis. The increase in use of either test was highest among countries which fully rolled out nationwide organized screening programs with fecal tests between 2013-2015 and 2018-2020 (increases ranging from 19.1% units in Belgium to 46.3% units in The Netherlands) and was lowest among countries with opportunistic offering of fecal test, colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy (from - 3% units in Germany to + 12.2% units in Slovakia). Changes in screening programs were strongly associated with higher rates of utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test across all screening offers. Our findings highlight that well-organized and dynamic population screening strategies can rapidly and sustainably increase utilization of CRC screening tests in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.