ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Association Between CDK4/CDK6 Expression and Prognosis in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of Gastroesophageal Junction.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLimited data are available on the relationship between expression of CDK4/CDK6 and prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction (AEG).
methodsA total of 135 patients diagnosed with AEG and treated with esophagogastrostomy were included in this study. Protein expression of CDK4 and CDK6 was assayed by immunohistochemistry staining and scored by two experienced pathologists. Differences in clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed between CDK4/CDK6-positive and -negative groups by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The prognostic significance of CDK4/CDK6 in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.
resultsThe positive rates of CDK4 and CDK6 in AEG tissues were significantly higher than in adjacent tissues. CDK4 positivity was correlated with poor tumor differentiation, and CDK6 positivity was related to perineural invasion and poor tumor differentiation. There were no significant differences between CDK4/CDK6 expression and OS or PFS of AEG patients.
conclusionCDK4/CDK6 may serve as prognostic factors for poor tumor differentiation, and CDK6 may also be a prognostic marker of perineural invasion for AEG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40526319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.