Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40526277›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery.

Jacques Bistre-Varon, Muhammed Elhadi, Robert Wei, Jimena Alcocer-Barrios, Ryan Gunter, Joshua Coursey, Priya Prakash, Erin McAtee, Haley Lanser, Rachel Ellsworth and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacques Bistre-Varon *Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Muhammed Elhadi *Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert WeiHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Jimena Alcocer-BarriosHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Ryan GunterHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Joshua CourseyHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Priya PrakashHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Erin McAteeHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Haley LanserHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachel EllsworthHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew WeaverHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Jean-Paul LeFaveHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Eric M HaasHouston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX, USA. ehaasmd@houstoncolon.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The robotic NICE procedure is a novel minimally invasive approach in colorectal surgery, yet its learning curve remains undefined; this study aimed to define its distinct phases by analyzing operative time trends. A retrospective review of 170 consecutive NICE procedures performed by a single surgeon between May 2018 and August 2019 was undertaken. Skin-to-skin operative time was the learning curve surrogate and plotted with unadjusted and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses. Risk adjustment incorporated age, body mass index, ASA class, sex, prior abdominal surgery, diagnosis, anastomotic level, and the need for diverting loop ileostomy-used as a marker of case complexity rather than a direct time determinant. Phase-specific peri-operative outcomes were compared non-parametrically. Five proficiency phases were identified: Initial Learning (cases 1-10), Experienced (11-65), Second Learning (66-80), Advanced Experienced (81-124) and Mastery (125-170). The unadjusted CUSUM rose to + 342 min above the cohort mean by case 10, crossed the baseline at case 55, then gradually declined and plateaued at approximately -215 min by case 170. Risk-adjusted CUSUM displayed parallel inflection points (peak + 78 min, nadir -162 min), confirming that an easier case mix did not explain efficiency gains. Mean operative time fell from 248.8 ± 64.1 min in the first phase to approximately 185 min in Mastery, and inter-quartile variability narrowed from 125 to 59 min. Intraoperative complications (overall 12.4%), blood loss, organ/space surgical site infection, and 30-day morbidity did not differ across phases (p > 0.05). The robotic NICE procedure follows a five-phase learning curve, with true proficiency-and a 20% reduction in operative time-achieved after ~ 55 cases. Safety metrics remained similar across phases, confirming that efficiency gains reflect skill acquisition rather than easier case mix. These milestones can guide training for surgeons adopting the technique.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalColonColorectal SurgeryLearning CurveRectumRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesColorectal surgeryLearning curveNatural orifice intracorporeal anastomosisRobotic surgeryTransrectal extraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.