ArticlePurinergic signalling2025
Acute effects of guanosine or inosine in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock.
Article in Purinergic signalling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolomic changes of uterine fluid of lactating cows with subclinical endometritis and treated with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic shock (HS) leads to systemic hypoperfusion, impaired tissue oxygenation, and multi-organ dysfunction, including central nervous system (CNS) injury. Guanosine and inosine, purine nucleosides with neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties, have demonstrated beneficial effects in models of neurotoxicity, ischemia, and septic shock. This study evaluated the acute effects of guanosine and inosine in fluid resuscitation, focusing on brain energy metabolism, neuroinflammatory mechanisms, and hemodynamic responses in a porcine model of HS. Thirty pigs (25-30 kg) underwent controlled hemorrhage to achieve a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 - 45 mmHg, maintained for 60 min. Animals were randomized into three resuscitation groups: Lactated Ringer's solution (LR), LR + guanosine (1 mmol/L), and LR + inosine (1 mmol/L), administered over 15 - 20 min. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and neuronal parameters were monitored for 440 min post-HS, with serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling to assess glutamate, lactate, glucose, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and inflammatory cytokines. HS induced metabolic acidosis, increased CSF glutamate levels, and elevated proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-8). Guanosine and inosine reduced glutamate levels more rapidly than LR alone and attenuated IL-1β and TNF-α elevations. Inosine resuscitation improved MAP, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), suggesting enhanced hemodynamic stabilization. Guanosine and inosine modulated neuroinflammatory and metabolic responses in HS, reducing excitotoxicity and inflammatory cytokine release. Inosine also demonstrated hemodynamic benefits. These findings support further investigation into their therapeutic potential in shock resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.