ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Evaluation of Four Semi-Mechanistic Models for Predicting Glycemic Control With a Glucagon Receptor Antagonist in People With Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Semi-Mechanistic HbA1c Models in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Strengths, Limitations, and Applications.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for measuring long-term glycemic efficacy over at least 3 months in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Being able to predict HbA1c using glucose response from studies of less than 3 months would be useful. Four semi-mechanistic HbA1c models (ADOPT, FFH, FHH, and IGRH) were evaluated for their predictive performance of longer-term HbA1c at 24 weeks of treatment using glucose and HbA1c data up to 4 weeks of treatment. A novel glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) was evaluated in T2D patients for glycemic control. The models were built using LY2409021 pharmacokinetics, glucose, and HbA1c data from a 4-week Phase 1b study. Predictive performance of the models was assessed based on comparing model-estimated and observed HbA1c values from a 24-week Phase 2b study. Metrics for predictive performance included: (a) mean change from baseline HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) at Week 24 between observed and simulated values; (b) mean prediction error (MPE) for bias; and (c) root mean squared error (RMSE) for precision. Overall, the FHH and IGRH models closely predicted the mean ΔHbA1c at Week 24 within 0.1% difference from the observed values in the Phase 2b study. Both models also had reasonable bias (absolute MPE < 0.1%) and precision (RMSE < 0.3%) estimates. Conversely, the ADOPT and FFH models over-predicted the mean reduction in HbA1c by 0.288% and 0.153%, respectively. The FHH and IGRH models featured transit compartments for modeling long delays between glucose and HbA1c. Thus, these models better represented the physiology and provided superior predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.