ArticleNeotropical entomology2025
Selectivity of Botanical and Synthetic Insecticides on Doru luteipes: There Is No Simple Answer.
Article in Neotropical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To achieve sustainability in agricultural pest management, it is essential to integrate chemical and biological control by using selective insecticides. In this study, we evaluated the lethal and sublethal effects of both botanical and synthetic insecticides used for controlling the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on its natural enemy Doru luteipes (Scudder) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). For this purpose, bioassays of mortality, behavior, and transgenerational effects were conducted. Botanical insecticides rich in acetogenins and limonoids caused less than 30% mortality in D. luteipes nymphs (2nd, 3rd, and 4th instars). In contrast, chlorantraniliprole-based insecticide (Premio®) was highly toxic, presenting mortality above 80% at all nymphal stages and reducing predation capacity by 55.9% and walking velocity by 28.4% compared to the control. Aqueous emulsion of the ethanolic extract from Annona mucosa seeds (ESAM) reduced the longevity of the adults by 32.72 days compared to the control. Chlorantraniliprole resulted in the shortest pre-oviposition period (9.4 days), followed by a limonoids-based botanical insecticide (Azamax®) (11.0 days). Fourth-instar nymphs of the F
Indexed as
Identifiers
40526167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.