Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40526162›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2025

Enhancing cerebral infarct classification by automatically extracting relevant fMRI features.

Vitaly I Dobromyslin, Wenjin Zhou, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vitaly I DobromyslinUniversity of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
Wenjin ZhouUniversity of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA. Wenjin_Zhou@uml.edu.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection of cortical infarct is critical for timely treatment and improved patient outcomes. Current brain imaging methods often require invasive procedures that primarily assess blood vessel and structural white matter damage. There is a need for non-invasive approaches, such as functional MRI (fMRI), that better reflect neuronal viability. This study utilized automated machine learning (auto-ML) techniques to identify novel infarct-specific fMRI biomarkers specifically related to chronic cortical infarcts. We analyzed resting-state fMRI data from the multi-center ADNI dataset, which included 20 chronic infarct patients and 30 cognitively normal (CN) controls. This study utilized automated machine learning (auto-ML) techniques to identify novel fMRI biomarkers specifically related to chronic cortical infarcts. Surface-based registration methods were applied to minimize partial-volume effects typically associated with lower resolution fMRI data. We evaluated the performance of 7 previously known fMRI biomarkers alongside 107 new auto-generated fMRI biomarkers across 33 different classification models. Our analysis identified 6 new fMRI biomarkers that substantially improved infarct detection performance compared to previously established metrics. The best-performing combination of biomarkers and classifiers achieved a cross-validation ROC score of 0.791, closely matching the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging methods used in acute stroke detection. Our proposed auto-ML fMRI infarct-detection technique demonstrated robustness across diverse imaging sites and scanner types, highlighting the potential of automated feature extraction to significantly enhance non-invasive infarct detection.

Indexed as

Auto-MLCortical infarctInfarct detectionMachine learningResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID40526162
PMCPMC12173967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.