Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Multicenter clinical trial for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with a non-permanent orthodontic intraoral device in children.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05661747 (Use of Intraoral Device to Treat Snoring, Sleep Apnea, and Other Symptoms of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of Intraoral Device to Treat Snoring, Sleep Apnea, and Other Symptoms of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Children
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Orthodontist in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Clinical Practice Framework.Cureus · 2026Review
- Efficacy of van Beek headgear activator in adolescents with UARS and hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion: dentofacial morphology, airway, and growth.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Controlled Prospective Evidence of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Efficacy in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Investigation on mouth breathing behavior of school-age children and analysis of health intervention strategies.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Maxillary appliances for the treatment of moderate obstructive sleep apnea: adjustability and mechanisms.Trials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a non-permanent orthodontic oral appliance intermittently worn in reducing the signs and symptoms of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A non-randomized interventional pre-post study was conducted in 2018-2021 with up to 24-month follow-up at five US and Canadian sites. Participants were 55 enrolled OSA-diagnosed children, fit with a customized device worn in the evening and while sleeping to provide slow maxillary expansion. Participants were assessed for treatment efficacy by three co-primary endpoints, the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and intermolar width; and two secondary endpoints, the PSQ Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders (SRBD) subscale scores and airway volume by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Forty-seven participants were included in the analytic dataset following trial completion after 12-24 months. PSQ symptom scores decreased 31.0% with a posttreatment-pretreatment difference score mean±SE and 95% CI of -0.13 ± 0.019 [-0.17, -0.09]; AHI decreased 29.3% (-3.47±1.015 [-5.52, -1.42]). All participants showed an intermolar width increase, averaging 13.0% (4.03 ± 0.421 [3.18, 4.88]). PSQ SRBD subscale scores decreased 57.8% (-0.178 ± 0.031 [-0.24, -0.12]). Airway volume by CBCT scans increased 67.8% (4053.78 ± 885.433 mm
conclusionParticipants showed objective and subjective OSA improvement, and all demonstrated maxillary expansion. Seventy-nine percent of participants showed AHI improvement, with 61.7% improving by 50% or more, and 17% resolved their OSA. Seventy-seven percent with moderate or severe OSA improved by 50%, while 93% with severe OSA achieved this milestone. This is the first study demonstrating that slow maxillary expansion by this device is safe and efficacious in treating children with OSA.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05661747 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05661747 ) Registered: December 14, 2022, retrospectively registered. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Adenotonsillectomy is the primary treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) but is invasive and has proximal and long-term risks. Secondary treatments include rapid maxillary expansion that has numerous adverse effects due to its 24/7 use and treatment speed, and positive airway pressure that is limited by patient intolerance and nonadherence. WHAT IS NEW: • This oral appliance is the first one FDA cleared for OSA treatment in children, and this study showed that slow maxillary expansion by this device was safe and efficacious for treating pediatric OSA. It is also the only pediatric non-permanent orthodontic device that is removable and intermittently worn to treat OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.