Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525877›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation

Purpose Renewal in Adults With Persisting Symptoms After Concussion: Results of a Non-Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Natalie V Covington, Mary Vining Radomski, Alisa Kocian, Sandra Castro-Pearson, Amanda A Herrmann, Kristina Kath, Libby Lindenfelser, Sandy Arntson Schwalbe, Sharon Gowdy Wagener, Joette Zola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalie V CovingtonAuthor Affiliations: Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Drs Covington, Radomshi, Kocian, Kath, Schewalbe, Wagener, and Zola); Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Covington); Clinical Research, Informatics and Analytics, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Castro-Pearson); and Neuroscience Research Center, Health Partners Institute, St. Paul, Minnesota (Dr Herrmann).ORCID 0000-0002-0016-2654
Mary Vining Radomski
Alisa Kocian
Sandra Castro-Pearson
Amanda A Herrmann
Kristina Kath
Libby Lindenfelser
Sandy Arntson Schwalbe
Sharon Gowdy Wagener
Joette Zola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving with a sense of purpose in life is associated with numerous health benefits; however, some individuals with persisting symptoms after concussion are at risk for purpose disruption. The Compass Course is a group-based tele-practice intervention that supports purpose renewal after major health transitions.

objectivesTo assess the feasibility, acceptability, and implementability of the Compass Course for adults with persisting symptoms after concussion, in preparation for a future randomized controlled trial.

settingLarge healthcare system in the Midwestern United States.

participantsConvenience sample of 37 adults with persisting symptoms after concussion.

designNon-randomized pilot prospective cohort design.

interventionCompass Course purpose renewal intervention delivered in a group setting via Zoom by an interdisciplinary team of allied health clinician-researchers (occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, psychology).

main outcome measuresParticipants completed Likert scales to rate acceptability of the Compass Course intervention. Treatment fidelity was assessed by tracking the number of key intervention elements presented in each treatment session. Potential benefits of the intervention were assessed using validated measures of purpose and meaning in life.

resultsAcceptability ratings were strong across the vast majority of participants. Treatment fidelity was strong with nearly perfect adherence to prespecified intervention elements. Participants who completed the intervention had gains across all purpose in life outcomes, with improvements maintained at 2-month follow-up.

conclusionsThe Compass Course was highly acceptable to participants who completed the intervention; however, there was significant attrition suggesting a need for adaptations to the intervention and to trial procedures. Future work includes further intervention development, and a controlled feasibility trial to estimate treatment effects for a future well-powered clinical trial.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionPost-Concussion SyndromeAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwestern United StatesOccupational TherapyPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTelemedicineYoung Adultaspirationsbrain injuries traumaticfeasibility studiespatient-centered carepost-concussion syndromeposttraumatic growthpsychological well-beingpsychosocial interventionrehabilitationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40525877
PMCPMC12955975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.